NOTES ON THE SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT'S WORLD OF SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES

WHAT IS WRONG WITH

THESE SURVEILLANCE

OFFICERS AND AGENTS?

(ARE THEY NUMSKULLS

OR DIRTY-MINDED NUTS?)



In Singapore, massive surveillance efforts, practices, planning and activities carried out by the MSD/ISD officers have replaced almost all forms of police enforcement work!

A man surely needs a WILLING maid -- for the satisfaction of his sexual NEEDS and social WANTS. Why, then, are the MSD/ISD officers preventing me from satisfying my sexual NEEDS and social WANTS by stopping me from meeting AND PHYSICALLY CONTACTING women who are NOT prostitutes?

Do MSD/ISD officers hold that a man is guilty until proven innocent? Why do they, for instance, assume that I am guilty of "immoral" behaviour (MOSTLY by patronizing prostitutes?!) without having ever proved that I am indeed so? AND on what grounds, may I ask precisely, am I "immoral"?

MSD and ISD officers have breached principles of privacy which are lawfully protected elsewhere in the world.

What is "surveillance" but another name for spying? To watch individuals covertly, to film them, to listen in to their conversations or communications, to know where they are at any given moment, to amass data on every aspect of their lifestyles -- this, surely, is precisely what a spy is paid to do! And this is exactly what our government and large corporations are doing, and attempting to do, to every individual in this nation!

However, it is worth contemplating a single question: What is the difference between "surveillance" and "spying"?

In Singapore, all Internet Service Providers are operated by government-controlled or related organizations;

Article 17, U.N. International Covenant On Civil and Political Rights, Ratified by the General Assembly (and the U.S.) in 1984:

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Brad Jansen, Deputy Director for Technology Policy at the Free Congress Foundation:

Massive surveillance is a poor substitute for real law-enforcement and intelligenvce work. It is an after-the-fact method of crime-fighting. It is not designed to to prevent crime.

MASSIVE WIRETAPPING DOES NOT EQUAL SECURITY. INSTEAD, WE HAVE ELECTED TO JEOPARDIZING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY in exchange for poor law enforcement.

Dollars and Sense

Not American should blindly accept
reduction of his liberty simply because a government official says so.
The choice is a nation of laws or a nation of whims. No liberty is possible
with the latter, no matter how important the cause.

-- Tom Deweees (Commentator)

Computer/Phone Privacy

Congressman Ron Paul:

In the last few decades, much of our
privacy has been lost. And it's not only computers that deserve the blame. They
have only been useful magnifiers of what the prying eyes of Big Brother have wanted to see all along.